<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>EnviroDIY | zrti0803 | Mentions</title>
	<link>https://www.envirodiy.org/members/zrti0803/activity/mentions/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://www.envirodiy.org/members/zrti0803/activity/mentions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed mentioning zrti0803.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 19:21:35 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b24e2ccb298d774c5e2f6202f12872f7</guid>
				<title>Rene Schieritz replied to the topic Remote Water Quality System for Stream in the forum Infrastructure and Equipment</title>
				<link>https://www.envirodiy.org/topic/remote-water-quality-system-for-stream/#post-12374</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2018 07:43:46 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi <a href='https://www.envirodiy.org/members/zrti0803/' rel="nofollow ugc">@zrti0803</a>,</p>
<p>I had some experience with this. I would suggest that putting the box in the water with an attached cable is a bit of a hazard. You could end up losing the whole thing unless you very carefully lay the cable into the stream bed. Access is also an issue &#8211; it&#8217;s much easier if you can just pull your sensors up from the side.</p>
<p>What we&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3449"><a href="https://www.envirodiy.org/topic/remote-water-quality-system-for-stream/#post-12374" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>