<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>EnviroDIY | Dan | Activity</title>
	<link>https://www.envirodiy.org/members/dmevans1plymouth-edu/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://www.envirodiy.org/members/dmevans1plymouth-edu/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Dan.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 13:51:54 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">7a236f605fce93ae0b06dfd01502e7d9</guid>
				<title>Dan started the topic SDI12 and analog code in the forum Mayfly Data Logger</title>
				<link>https://www.envirodiy.org/topic/sdi12-and-analog-code/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2022 17:34:48 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>I am putting together a micromet station that includes some sdi12 sensors (meter group Terros 21, and Acclima 315H) and some analog thermistors (homebuilt but the same components as the Campbell Sci 107) with a second resistor (24.9K) wired between the return wire and the ground. I have some separate pieces of example code for the SDI12&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-8413"><a href="https://www.envirodiy.org/topic/sdi12-and-analog-code/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">da890da989576816dac8e9ed16988e9c</guid>
				<title>Dan replied to the topic PAR issue with Mayfly in the forum Mayfly Data Logger</title>
				<link>https://www.envirodiy.org/topic/par-issue-with-mayfly/#post-17405</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2022 14:34:55 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I updated the ADC library and changed the ADC definition on line 77 to the 1115 and that did the trick. 1.5V.   I am assuming that any past data taken in the field with the wrong ADC definition cannot be back calculated. But moving forward we have a working PAR sensor.</p>
<p>Thank you so much for taking the time to help solve this. Much appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1715d301995d45c3f08c7d4c5ef4bc4a</guid>
				<title>Dan replied to the topic PAR issue with Mayfly in the forum Mayfly Data Logger</title>
				<link>https://www.envirodiy.org/topic/par-issue-with-mayfly/#post-17399</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2022 15:56:13 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Current board that I am working on in the lab is a 0.5b. But we have run into the same issue with logging/calculating PAR using version 1.0 as well. We are running a mix of 0.5 and 1.0 in the field due to many of the older 0.5&#8217;s USB ports failing.</p>
<p>Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">442f9d902f0db71760838606c8771ac3</guid>
				<title>Dan replied to the topic PAR issue with Mayfly in the forum Mayfly Data Logger</title>
				<link>https://www.envirodiy.org/topic/par-issue-with-mayfly/#post-17393</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2022 14:47:12 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shannon,</p>
<p>As you suggested, I tested a duplicate of our set up in the lab and used a power supply source set at 1.5V in the aa0 and aa1 ports used to measure PAR on the mayfly. I get 93 mV and 470 umol for PAR. Clearly wrong. It appears the bits are recorded wrong or they are converted to mV incorrectly.  Any thoughts on a next step to&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-8331"><a href="https://www.envirodiy.org/topic/par-issue-with-mayfly/#post-17393" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ba4bed2015f7cfe2cfb5af36148adb6b</guid>
				<title>Dan replied to the topic PAR issue with Mayfly in the forum Mayfly Data Logger</title>
				<link>https://www.envirodiy.org/topic/par-issue-with-mayfly/#post-17388</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2022 14:08:14 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shannon</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll give your suggestions a shot and see if we learn anything.</p>
<p>Thanks for the quick reply.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ace60c4ef6b6f953f61f512c79071dda</guid>
				<title>Dan started the topic PAR issue with Mayfly in the forum Mayfly Data Logger</title>
				<link>https://www.envirodiy.org/topic/par-issue-with-mayfly/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2022 14:25:39 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>I am working with a team measuring a host of variables off of mostly SDI12 sensors using both the newest and older Mayflys. We have run into an issue measuring PAR on our Mayfly logger stations. We are using analog Apogee SQ 100 sensors. We get data from the sensors/code, but the output values are about 10x too low. The relevant code is&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-8320"><a href="https://www.envirodiy.org/topic/par-issue-with-mayfly/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9e81c8c3920c79037039b67e296bc1b9</guid>
				<title>Dan started the topic Vertical SD card in the forum Miscellaneous</title>
				<link>https://www.envirodiy.org/topic/vertical-sd-card/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2019 18:02:12 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it possible to buy the vertical micro SD card reader without buying the Mayfly starter kit? Has anyone found an alternate version of this type of reader? I like using small boxes due to the reduced costs, but having the SD card face out is often challenging to work around.<br />
Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f7aaf124cd17f6282e9462ded9831612</guid>
				<title>Dan became a registered member</title>
				<link>https://www.envirodiy.org/activity/p/4466/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2019 17:57:04 -0500</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>