<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>EnviroDIY | Kurt@UR | Activity</title>
	<link>https://www.envirodiy.org/members/kurtur/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://www.envirodiy.org/members/kurtur/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Kurt@UR.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 02:40:08 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">82872207f33c2ad4ff3ffecb8fdedfe1</guid>
				<title>Kurt@UR replied to the topic Inexpensive DO probe recommendations in the forum Environmental Sensors</title>
				<link>https://www.envirodiy.org/topic/inexpensive-do-probe-recommendations/#post-18934</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 15 Feb 2025 00:05:22 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The cathode is exposed.  I did rinse the cathode when I cleaned everything and there was nothing obviously fouling it.  The probe tip being under the membrane cap I considered pretty well protected. After examining my data and pictures of the probe tip, Atlas Scientific had no explanation other than saying maybe there was an unknown material&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-10494"><a href="https://www.envirodiy.org/topic/inexpensive-do-probe-recommendations/#post-18934" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b5a832a93adafda4ed4caf1b48186978</guid>
				<title>Kurt@UR started the topic Inexpensive DO probe recommendations in the forum Environmental Sensors</title>
				<link>https://www.envirodiy.org/topic/inexpensive-do-probe-recommendations/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2025 20:27:50 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Water Quality fans,</p>
<p>I would like to hear people’s experience with inexpensive dissolved oxygen (DO) probes, especially over long periods of time left in a river and if there are recommendations on what probes to use.  The desire is to keep the probe in a  river 24/7.  The application is in an urban environment somewhat hidden but still near&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-10488"><a href="https://www.envirodiy.org/topic/inexpensive-do-probe-recommendations/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e102d738502a0db0584fcca63936b1fb</guid>
				<title>Kurt@UR became a registered member</title>
				<link>https://www.envirodiy.org/activity/p/10471/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jan 2025 19:26:06 -0500</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>